this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
10 points (91.7% liked)
Fight For Privacy
294 readers
1 users here now
Fight For Privacy
A community to post, discuss and fight for our privacy.
Post Title Rule
Tag what the post is:
-
[DISCUSSION]
-
[CH], [etc.], : Article (tag the country, if not country specific use [ARTICLE])
-
[SEARCHING]: Searching for people/activists
-
[GUIDE]: Guide or how to
-
[UPDATE]: Moderator update for community
Post examples
- [EU] - Title of the link/post
- [DISCUSSION] - Privacy ...
- [SEARCHING] - Referendum ...
Language: English
Rules
- Keep the topic on privacy
- Be respectful and tolerant
- When posting link use tools like CleanURL to get rid of trackers
- When posting numbers or statements, you need to link the source
- Promotion of products/brands are forbidden
- Politics not regarding privacy is forbidden, keep it on laws/decisions that concern privacy
- If possible post Invidious links instead of YouTube
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You’ve missed the difference. The recorded line was previously for transaction records & training. The new greeting was updated to state that the recordings will be used differently -- to capture your voiceprint. A voiceprint is not merely a transaction record that gets deleted when no longer useful. It’s a biometric. After exfiltration it can be used by criminals to recreate your voice.
Of course nixing the account avoids it. But there are more clever ways. E.g. not calling. Possibly using a voice disguising algo. It’s also possible that the human-to-human chatter is not used for voiceprint capture. Certainly some banks have robots asking you pronounce certain words in the voiceprint capture process. It’s just as well possible that the bot’s menu of commands the it suggests you can use contain words used by the capture algo.