this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
358 points (97.6% liked)
Gaming
19859 readers
173 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have a 1070 and both performance and loading times have improved compared to CS:GO. 🤷
Intel A770 with stable mesa drivers, can get around 100-130fps mid settings at 4K in CS2, but got 200+ solid and just ran vsync on at 144Hz 4K very high settings in CSGO. Maybe it's just the Linux build (which notably received zero public beta testing) but my friend said the Windows version was lower frames on his AMD 580 than CSGO too.
How's the A770 treating you in general?
Pretty well overall. Performance is pretty solid on most games I play now, VRR is fixed finally, and I don't get graphical glitches. I bought it a month or so after it came out and it was rough in the beginning, lots of crashes and glitches.
I for sure drop frames on low settings with my low-end machine.
Same. I'm fine. I'm also not very obsessed about fps. As long as it's smooth I'm good.
That's fair, but for an extremely competitive game like CS you're definitely in the minority
1070ti here 3600x didn't notice much of a difference, I'm still hitting 130-140 easy