this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
94 points (92.7% liked)
Asklemmy
43806 readers
1653 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
you don't, cuz why tf would you do that
it's objectively obsolete lol
Because tons of media that was never properly digitized for the streaming era and only ever ended up on discs.
Doing it now will prevent a loss of history, much like early BBC recordings are lost because they would just tape over old broadcasts to save money.
For example, there was recently unearthed a single episode of a sketch comedy show made by Graham Chapman and Douglas Adams.
Problem was, the tape it was on was from the formats before VHS and Betamax. While the tape existed, no players to play back the tape existed anymore. It took a several year effort to build a new player from scratch. Finally, after all that, they were able to record the show to digital media and now it lives on YouTube for people to see. It's not the funniest material ever produced by either man, but it's definitely a piece of history worth looking at if you've ever enjoyed Monty Python or The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.
Attempts to digitize things that are currently available on disc but not available in digital file formats/streaming is absolutely a process of maintaining historical documents that would otherwise be lost to time. Building a new DVD or Bluray player from scratch when none exist anymore is a much bigger effort than making a tape video player, because it involves proprietary codecs, compression, and DRM.
So, I let others archive those and have digital versions of content I want. I get the appeal of discs, but I also get appeal of no discs (I'm in the latter camp)
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
a single episode of a sketch comedy show made by Graham Chapman and Douglas Adams.
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Cool and all, but that also has nothing to do with this. If these services are renting/selling CDs, they've already been digitalized.
It, quite literally, has everything to do with this.
But keep pretending it doesn't and like you know better without actually presenting any argument of your own.
I'm sure that will work out for you. /s
You just replied to an argument of my own, nor did you say why it's wrong. It literally has nothing to do with it, and it still doesn't. If they sell it, it's already digitalized. That's all you need to realize that what you're saying completely falls flat. Reread that simple comment again, and apparently this one as well.
They're digitized to very specific formats that are proprietary, and once the devices that play them cease to exist, so does the data contained on them.
Digitizing them into a file format (which if you actually read the initial comment, would have noticed that I specified this) that is open, available, and easily transferable between a multitude of digital devices is a different issue.
EDIT: I went back and bolded it for you, since you seem to struggle with reading comprehension.
elaborate on how these sites sell CDs that are apparently impossible to digitalize as standard video formats, because that doesn't sound true at all
edit: yeah that's what I thought, maybe he realized on the third reply he completely misread the entire chain. Blocks me then continues to reply and edit all his comments lol. Very sane and definitely not emotional.
Because I didn't say that. Once again, your lack of reading comprehension rears its ugly head.
EDIT: it's interesting that they think I blocked them. Is that what they wanted?
I'm gonna go with projection here. It's not like they can't see when I made my edits.
I sadly see a lot of doom and gloom on the horizon when it comes to streaming services as a whole. Prices will increase, Ads will become common place and limitations on how and when you view your content (Hardware exclusivity for example).
Additionally, as others mentioned some media will just be lost to the ages. Many movies and shows will likely never come to a streaming service and are lost to time. Kevin Smiths Dogma for example will likely never come to a streaming service.
Archiving and backing up a DVD, Blu Ray or UHD can be very valuable to a user even today. I run a personal JellyFin with over 1000 movie titles. Having instant access to a library like this can not compare to any streaming service in size or quality and it has zero subscription fees.
But each to their own.
Crazy, once you do back it up, then the CD becomes irrelevant. That's what I said. CD's being obsolete doesn't mean streaming is the only other option, despite if the circlejerk reads it as that way. Reality and the market is what's proving these as obsolete/
In Japan, a large part of the digital manga/anime/videogames are still being released only on CDs/DVDs, no online access.
no, they put it online on a website called hanime
Youβre not necessarily wrong, but you are unbearable.
Just because a technology has been eclipsed, it doesnβt mean it no longer has value.
Optical media is really the best choice for data archival. Magnetic media is far more subject to big rot. High quality CDs, DVDs and to a lesser extent Blu-ray Discs can last an order of magnitude longer.
Data redundancy exists, and tape backups is a completely different technology then CDs/DVDs/Blueray/etc, which is what this topic is about. Then I should be an easy block for you.
Because not everyone has gigabit fiber run to their door. Streaming is not always the answer. I have read through all the back and forth here, but this is the point that was lost in the conversation. While it may be obsolete to you, it's still the easiest way to transfer large amounts of data to someone that might not have any internet other than their cell phone service.
Why do these replies assume that streaming is the only other option lol. The emotional circlejerk is strong here. Digital formats are just better now.
Not sure what you mean. You said disc based media is obsolete, and I explained why it isn't. I am not arguing about digital vs analog here. I am explaining why a form of digital media is still in use.
If I don't buy or rent a physical disc and I don't stream the movie exactly how would I watch the movie?
You download from internet or lan , or you can get from usb
The USB isn't really a realistic option for a lot of people. As for downloading basically same problem as streaming, need a decent internet connection..
My dad,with where he lives, the internet is so slow if he wanted to download a movie, it would take so long that by the time it would download he would no longer care to watch the movie..
Which means he would have to find someone with decent internet, go to their house, download it. Then go home and play it. Again this isn't an option for a lot of people. Including my dad.
For a lot of people renting or buying a disc is really the only option to watch a movie.
Some areas have even worse internet or none at all. To be able to reliably watch a movie means having the physical disc. Yeah they could get a data file and hold it like they do a physical disc just on a hard drive. But drives die a lot faster then a disc does. Plus they have to continously find someone to use their internet. Driving into town and going to best buy or Walmart it many times more efficient.
If you prefer digital files compared physical disc great go for it but for a lot of people it just isn't real
Idk if you've heard in oppressive countries, but USBs filled with media is like a currency.
https://www.unilad.com/news/usb-bottles-north-korea-kim-jongun-158902-20221206
There's similar stuff in India too. There was a campaign that sent a bunch of balloons over to north Korea with USB sticks and a ton of American movies on them.
So they are definitely realistically used in a lot of places and can be reused.
OK so in the US in the example I gave where would my dad to to legally aquire and download the movie?
I'm just telling you that USBs are very much used as trading media in the real world, more so then you think. I don't care about your dad lol. What is the point of this days old discussion right now, I don't really care anymore
CDs, DVDs and Blu-Ray discs are all digital formats.