Starfield

2850 readers

7 users here now

Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!

Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)

Helpful links:

Spoiler policy:

No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
Add [Spoilers] to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post.
Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!

Post & comment spoiler syntax:

&lt;spoiler here>

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Now that we've had SF for a bit, what do you think? Good, flawed, bad? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] A_Random_Idiot 1 points 1 year ago

Everyone should be irked at Todd for his comments.

We shouldnt have to build super computers to get stable, playable FPS, because hes too stupid to give up this game engine they've been absolutely obsessed with for over 20 years, cause Creation engine is nothing more but Gambryo, and Gamebryo is nothing more than NetImmerse.. They've just slapped a lot of ducttape and bullshit on it to make it look better, at the cost of bad optimization and performance.

Cyberpunk is a far more visually impressive game, and I get 50% more frame rate in that, than Starfield...and I'm on AMD, Which isnt facing the same issues nvidia cards are in starfield.