this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
63 points (90.9% liked)

Capitalism in Decay

127 readers
1 users here now

Fascism is capitalism in decay. As with anticommunism in general, the ruling class has oversimplified this phenomenon to the point of absurdity and teaches but a small fraction of its history. This is the spot for getting a serious understanding of it (from a more proletarian perspective) and collecting the facts that contemporary anticommunists are unlikely to discuss.

Posts should be relevant to either fascism or neofascism, otherwise they belong in [email protected]. If you are unsure if the subject matter is related to either, share it there instead. Off‐topic posts shall be removed.

No capitalist apologia or other anticommunism. No bigotry, including racism, misogyny, ableism, heterosexism, or xenophobia. Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome.

For our purposes, we consider early Shōwa Japan to be capitalism in decay.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The elderly veteran, Yaroslav Hunka was honored during a session in which President Volodomyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine addressed the lawmakers to thank them for their support since Russia invaded his country, saying Canada has always been on “the bright side of history.” The Speaker of the House of Commons, Anthony Rota — who had compared Zelenskyy to Winston Churchill — recognized a “veteran from the Second World War who fought for Ukrainian independence against the Russians and continues to support the troops today even at his age of 98.”

The assembly then rose to applaud a man in a khaki uniform standing on the balcony, who saluted, according to this screenshot from Canadian television.

The man was identified as Hunka by the Associated Press, which published a photograph showing Zelenskyy smiling and raising a fist during the ovation.

The AP caption described Hunka as having “fought with the First Ukrainian Division in World War II before later immigrating to Canada.” The First Ukrainian Division is another name for the 14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS, the military wing of the [NSDAP]; the unit was also called SS Galichina.

The comparison to Winston Churchill is actually quite suitable, but not for the reasons that they had in mind.

Related: Leader of Canada’s House of Commons apologizes for honoring man who fought for Nazis. Quote:

“I particularly want to extend my deepest apologies to Jewish communities in Canada and around the world. I accept full responsibility for my action,” Rota said. […] Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office said in a statement that Rota had apologized and accepted full responsibility for issuing the invitation to Hunka and for the recognition in Parliament. “This was the right thing to do,” the statement said. “No advance notice was provided to the Prime Minister’s Office, nor the Ukrainian delegation, about the invitation or the recognition.”

Make of that what you will.

ETA: ‘His Waffen SS unit bombed children at Toronto's largest Ukrainian community center on Canadian Thanksgiving back in 1949. Few days on the front page, then never spoken of again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They are not sorry for honoring a Nazi in their center of governance. They are sorry they got caught.

If you don't know what or who "fought for Ukrainian independence against Russia during WW2", then you are an idiot.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I want to believe this is just Hanlon's Razor.

They probably looked up "Canadian citizens that fought in Ukraine during WWII" so that their comment about Churchill would have more impact, but then just didn't do any other research.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The issue of Ukrainian Nazis being in Ukraine isn’t new though. The fact that there are several memorials to the Waffen SS in Canada comes up in the news fairly regularly when the things get vandalized.

They knew.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)