this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
1454 points (96.4% liked)
memes
10657 readers
3418 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
Sister communities
- [email protected] : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- [email protected] : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- [email protected] : Linux themed memes
- [email protected] : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Should we really be propping up jobs of dubious usefulness rather than going after a proper social safety net? We could pay people to dig random holes and others to fill them in if we just wanted to pointless jobs. Why not just hand out the money directly? Why the perverse requirement to make them jump through hoops for it? It feels... condescending to me to knowingly make someone do a task that could be automated just to give them a pay check.
Ever since the lamplighters lost their jobs its all gone downhill.
Bring back the gas station attendants, make everywhere New Jersey!
If cashier isn't a useful job, why are these mega-corporations trying to get me to do it for free?
Sorry, guess I was just living in reality and not a Pixar future where people get taken care of.
You're already wasting energy being angry about it. Might as well aim a little higher with the fantasy. We all deserve better.
So we should just maintain the status quo exactly as it is right now to make sure no one loses their job? Should we stop all automation to make sure that there's more jobs for people?