this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
168 points (85.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43965 readers
1911 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Interesting article didnt know where it fit best so I wanted to share it here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Conciousness is just an emergent property of the multiple parts of the brain trying to interpret and respond to its surroundings.

Edit: I stand by what I said, but you all don't need to be so mean and vile about it....

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow. I'm glad you figured that out. I thought it was going to be so much more difficult.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's ok if you disagree! What do you think it is?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

it is not about disagreeing. It is your certainty and absolutism on matters that are in no way certain or absolute

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

First, I appreciate your calm response in the context of my sarcasm. It's not what I'm used to on the Internet, and it's refreshing.

My simplest answer is that I don't know. Neuroscience has made a lot of progress in the last several decades, but I'm unaware of any credible researchers claiming to have a unified theory of consciousness yet. We probably still have a long way to go, assuming it's even possible to know.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That sounds like a swell, materialist solution, but it just kicks the can down the metaphysical road and creates more questions than it answers. What parts of the brain interact to create it? What is the subjective experience "made" of? Some kind of energy? How much complexity is required for it to emerge? Are there levels of consciousness? Are babies born with a consciousness that grows more robust over time, or does it pop in at some discrete level? Does the galaxy have an emergent consciousness, it's certainly more complex than the human brain. What about the universe?

Even if "it's an emergent property" is true, it's not a very useful answer. It's like saying babies come from the hospital, it skips over the part we're asking the question about.

Panpsychism is probably the most scientifically conservative explanation of consciousness. "Energy fields permeating the universe and interacting with each other" is the model scientists use to explain many, many phenomena, from electromagnetism to mass.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

We don't have all the answers yet but we're making progress in finding them.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7597170/#:~:text=A%20crucial%20element%20in%20connectionists,as%20to%20sustain%20conscious%20experiences.

All the evidence so far seems to indicate that consciousness is a purely physical phenomenon .. despite the fact that it may not seem so to us

[โ€“] Scew 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

is just

My favorite response for this is 'point to your mind.'

My mean response is '[email protected] is just a random user name with some words attached and no person actually exists behind it.'

Another response could be "A car is just some wheels and an engine."

Sure would be fun to watch someone try and drive some wheels and an engine.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you need to be so needlessly rude?

[โ€“] Scew 1 points 1 year ago

Is 'your' interpretation of things the only one that exists?

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one's been rude though, I don't know what you're considering "rude" or "vile"

[โ€“] Scew 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The default response I get most of the time I comment on things is along the lines of "You shouldn't have thoughts or opinions and because you shared them I'm going to get as many other users to attack you as possible."

Thought this might be different considering the context of this post, but here we are. You're getting downvoted as much as you are upvoted for pointing out that someone is trying to manipulate the context to attack me. No responses either because if they aren't actually bots they seem to have trouble coming up with any kind of understandable explanation for their behavior.

It's like being in traffic and getting flicked off by the person that cut you off... when there was no one behind you...

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point of emerging systems is that they tend to be more than just a sum of their parts:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gestalt

[โ€“] Scew 1 points 1 year ago

In One Piece the main characters name is Luffy.

https://onepiece.fandom.com/wiki/Episode_2