this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
141 points (94.9% liked)

Gaming

20022 readers
745 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] demonsword -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But even rolling from there, a 300% hike in base prices would mean games cost $200, and that’s just not true.

if you consider that nowadays (almost) all games ship incomplete and demand DLCs... yeah, it's true

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That wouldn't be the base price; the base price is $70 for the biggest games. I think people are also a bit liberal with labeling games as "incomplete", when really they mean, "this game will have DLC after the fact because it's the best way to make games that take years to make without laying people off". And just to take a brief look along some games in my library, Cyberpunk 2077 would cost a maximum of $100 with DLC, by the time Guilty Gear Strive is sunset (if it runs for 5 years) it will still be shy of $200 in a worst case, and I'm seeing far more games without DLC than with DLC.

[–] demonsword 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DLCs aren't the only "evil", there's also the case for microtransactions and other stupid monetization bullshit schemes

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So don't play those games. The only way that's "almost all games" is if you're looking at the mobile market. Once again, still not included in the base price.

[–] demonsword 3 points 1 year ago

So don’t play those games

...and I don't, I prefer supporting indie devs