this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
192 points (91.4% liked)

World News

32519 readers
608 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (21 children)

It certainly isn’t capitalist to have such an insane gap between offer and supply

Sure it is! Capitalists just do it in the opposite direction; keep supply low so prices stay high.

[–] camelCaseGuy 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

No, that's an effect of collusion and cartelization of the economy. It's because you have very few actors supplying the product and the barriers of creating a similar product are too high, so new competitors cannot access the market. Then the current suppliers can sit on the product and wait for it to be at the right price, as long as it doesn't go to waste.

As you can see, all of this screens about real estate:

  • Cartelization/collusion: The aren't that many companies that have properties on sale
  • High cost to enter: Building is pricey, and it depends on the location of the property more than anything. So a building in one neighborhood is not a direct replacement of a building in another neighborhood.
  • Real estate does not go to waste. Unless bad luck or poor choices, your building should work fine for a couple of generations. And worst case scenario, the land already has a price.

This is the time when governments should intervene and come up with a proposal to solve the cartelization.

[–] Dead_or_Alive 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

We have a solution, it is called anti trust legislation. We need to break up all of these too large to fail organizations. It’s ridiculous that we have only a handful of major players in soo many markets.

[–] camelCaseGuy 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, of course we do. We just need politicians willing to do that. I thinks that's the most difficult part.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)