this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
-4 points (38.9% liked)
UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs
1226 readers
3 users here now
A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.
New to Lemmy?
See the Getting Started Guide
Want Disclosure?
Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.
Community Spotlight
Featured Posts and User Investigations
Useful Links
- UAP Guide
- Disclosure Diaries
- UAP Timeline
- UFOs Wiki
- MUFON - Mutual UFO Network
- Investigate a Sighting
- Report a Sighting
Community Rules
- Follow the Code of Conduct.
- Posts must be on-topic.
- No duplicate posts.
- No commercial activity.
- No memes.
- Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
- Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
- Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
- Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
- Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.
Other Communities
If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Regardless of people's thoughts on Maussan, I still think it's important to give research a chance on this. I see a lot of people arguing that we should just dismiss anything he says, but I think it just calls for a more stringent review of claims. If a fraudster came across legitimate specimen do you honestly think they'd pass it up? There is definitely questionable origins of these and some seemingly sloppy initial research, but if there are people in the scientific community interested then let them have at it.
I'm personally curious to see more research done on these. Thoughts on what these are or their validity may change as time goes on, but I'm excited to see what more is learned about them. Even if the end result isn't as exciting as some believe, I still find the review process interesting.
Being skeptical is a good thing. You don't have to personally get invested in something you don't believe in. Just let those that are interested research it and come to their own conclusions.