this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1658 readers
85 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This issue really irks me. It's like the Dutch(?) trains that are run 'completely on solar power' when in reality, they just use the equivalent amount of solar power. Using this logic you can just separately assign factories etc with equivalent power usage and say they are 'completely run on solar power' without referencing the other blocks, and voila, suddenly everything is green and run on a single solar panel. Dishonest accounting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

completely on solar power' when in reality, they just use the equivalent amount of solar power.

I don't see the difference myself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In this case, it looks like TWG is actually contributing to new solar installations. However, the difference to me is like this:

NZ generates around 80% of it's power from renewable resources. So a wind farm could just sell the right to say Countdown to say that the power generated there is for Countdown. Nothing changed, no new renewable generation was created, no one built a wind farm for Countdown. They simply painted their logo on the side and said now we are powered by renewable energy, with exacly zero environmental improvement over the state before.

If TWG are actually funding new solar farms then that's a bit different, it at least has a real world impact.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the Countdown example, they'd have to make sure their power use was matched by what the generator was putting in, in which case they can accurately claim they sold the power to countdown. They may well be paying significantly more per MWH than someone buying coal or gas generated power at the same time.

While it may seem bizarre, it's how our energy grid and market works.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a made up example. but yeah, plenty of places claim to be powered by this or that and I doubt they are counting the timing of it in their claim.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd be shocked if they weren't myself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I wonder if we'll ever know.