this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
1318 points (98.5% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

28899 readers
19 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] zephyr 28 points 1 year ago (7 children)

so good it goes close source

That's what the GPL is for: preserve freedom of the users.

[โ€“] grue 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

To put a finer point on it, that's precisely why it's important for Free Software to be copyleft rather than merely permissively-licensed. (And for it to either have a trustworthy copyright holder, like the Free Software Foundation or similar non-profit, or to have too many copyright holders to make changing the license tractable.)

[โ€“] Freesoftwareenjoyer 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Exactly. They would have to rewrite all the code in order to make it proprietary. AGPL license ensures that not even an instance owner can (legally) change the code of their own instance without releasing the modified source code.

We need to make sure that any apps that are created for Lemmy, also have a Copyleft license. At the very least they should be Free Software (which doesn't seem to be guaranteed sadly, since most people don't know what that means).

[โ€“] funkyb 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Created for Lemmy" isn't really a thing, all you need is to implement the ActivityPub protocol. Whether or not it has any relationship to Lemmy has no bearing on if it can talk to instances using Lemmy's implementation.

[โ€“] Freesoftwareenjoyer 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I see, but apps are already being created specifically for using Lemmy. Like Jerboa. So there must be a reason why people want to use them instead of using apps for Mastodon?

[โ€“] AustralianSimon 3 points 1 year ago

Mastodon mobile apps and Lemmy mobile apps are not compatible with each other afaik. The Lemmy API is different to the Mastodon API. Their communication protocol between instances is ActivityPub.

[โ€“] grue 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think what the other guy meant was more along the lines of pointing out that there's no way to enforce that software interacting with Lemmy has to be copyleft.

[โ€“] Freesoftwareenjoyer 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, yes, that wouldn't be possible.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)