this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
613 points (97.4% liked)

unions

1793 readers
42 users here now

a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc

Friends:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neanderthal 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I even question the usefulness at high levels. It doesn't measure how much wealth is produced. Say our GDP is 10 billion. Let's say 2 billion is tshirts that suck and get thrown away. Next year we make tshirts that last 5 years and our GDP is 11 billion because they cost more. Year 3, it shrinks to 9 billion because we don't have to make as many tshirts. We are better off in year 3 than year 1 by a billion, because we actually kept those shirts instead of tossing them.

I would like to see GDP numbers adjusted for useful production. E.g. since 40% of food is trashed, cut that portion of the GDP by 30% (we need some wiggle room so a bad crop doesn't cause a famine)