Dreamlight Valley

117 readers

1 users here now

Dedicated to the discussion of Dreamlight Valley, a Gameloft game.

Sister Communities

DDV on blahaj.zone, feel free to crosspost!

Rules

Be excellent to each other: Users are expected to comport themselves in a civil manner when participating in discussions.
Keep it relevant: Posts must be related to Disney Dreamlight Valley.
Keep it SFW: SWF stands for "Safe for Work".
Hide spoilers: Use the spoiler tag for spoilers on newly released content. After two weeks post-release content is no longer considered "new."

Guides & Tips

Downloadable Help

Dreamlight Valley Guide by AJL (Android)
Lady Jane's guide compilation (PDF) (Updated 6/7/23)

Information

Promotional Codes List (Updated 6/7/23)
Appetizers, Entrées, Desserts
Farming, Foraging, Fishing
Crop Profitability Graph
Hairstyles Checklist
House Skins List

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

WintryLemon

A Monetization Conversation (self.dreamlightvalley)

submitted 1 year ago by WintryLemon to c/dreamlightvalley

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Curious what the smaller group here thinks of the way the newest content release is handling monetization, primarily the shift into gating quests behind moonstones. I'm not real sure what I think about it and keep fluctuating back and forth between irritated about paying for the game and then being expected to continue paying for content, and finding it pretty par for the coruse for modern games and thus about as inoffensive as microtransactions are capable of being.

I think I've settled on it being inoffensive, at least in terms of microtransaction models. Admittedly I'm also the kind of idiot who has paid $25 for a pretty mount or two on World of Warcraft regardless of having paid for the game and each expansion, but eh. There seems to be a lot of angst surrounding it and I do understand why.

What are you guys' thoughts on all this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] WintryLemon 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This doesn't come off unhinged to me. Microtransactions represent a legitimately toxic shift in the way games approach earning profit. I don't think having a strong opinion on it is unreasonable, and it's probably worth admitting that there's a significant chunk of my "eh, whatever" viewpoint that's informed by the practice just being so common today, which is honestly a whole 'nother can of worms that I might benefit from prying open at some point.

I think our (I'm making some assumptions about age bracket!) generation tends to be the most unhappy about microtransactions because we grew up in gaming during a time when it was an expectation that when you bought a game it was complete, had been bug tested, and having paid for it meant that it belonged to you. The company couldn't come into your house and take away what you bought at some later date; the idea of that would have been preposterous. We've gone from buying games to renting access. It haasn't been a healthy shift for the consumer.

What's history with Gameloft, curiously? I'm gathering it's been especially egregious with this sort of thing? Googling it netted me this on the topic, which was a decent read.