this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
445 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39184 readers
2679 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago (40 children)
[–] uwe 44 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm going to be a dad in a few weeks. 🥲 (Feel free to dunk on me with the inevitable 'why?'s, and 'did you live under a rock?' I can't feel any worse anymore anyway 🤗)

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I chose not to have kids. You can have my carbon offset.

Individual guilt for systemic problems plays well to the elites (ultra-wealthy). Unless you’re a billionaire. Then I want my offset back.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I also don't have kids so have my carbon offset as well

[–] Plopp 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also don't have kids but I'm keeping my carbon offset to my damn self.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'll take that axe if it improves my carbon offset

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mine is 7 months old now. I felt the same. Just wait, you'll likely feel that it was the best thing you ever did. Your kid may be the one to drive some positive change. Just do the best you can and give yourself some grace.

[–] theonetruejason 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes everyone should use this logic. Your kid might be the one, have 10 to increase your odds!

[–] SCB 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Realistically, 10 probably would spread your resources too thin, if you want each to excel enough to be part of the solution.

3-5 though, that's a good range.

[–] theonetruejason 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your sarcasm detector needs a tune up.

[–] SCB 10 points 1 year ago

No I understood the sarcasm, and responded as the "straight foil"

It's the style of humor of Tommy Lee Jones's character in Men In Black.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good luck to you and yours. I sincerely hope we’re wrong about how bad we think it’s going to get in the next 50 years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You wrote hope but that message can go either way

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Human problems have human solutions.

Renewables are already cheaper than fossil fuels, it just takes time for the economics to shake out.

Plenty of jobs in a clean economy as well.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

...it just takes time...

Yeah, that's the thing the scientists are saying we're running out of though.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Change starts slowly but the effects compound

Edit

[–] theonetruejason 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some other effects are compounding faster…

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Fossil fuel use isn't

[–] Badgernomics -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"...faster than expected." I feel like we've been hearing that alot over the last few years, it's like the tagline for the climate crisis.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The effects from about 250 years of industrialization sure did compound, huh?

So we'll compound more and be right on track in what, 300-350 years?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Industrial revolution was not global, renewables are

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If industrialization wasn't global surely the effects of it weren't global either 🤡

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Upgrade your reading comprehension 🤡

Where did the industrial revolution start?

It was not global from 1760 to 1820 ya jabroni

Renewables are being implemented in a far wider geographic than the Industrial Revolution was is my point

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My point is the implications of the industrial revolution don't stop at national borders.

You don't need every country to emit pollution when they all share the same atmosphere.

And it's overwhelmingly likely that the rollout of renewables and environmentally responsible infrastructure won't happen everywhere at once. It begins in the countries with the ability and materials to produce such systems.

Do you have a map of existing renewable use per capital to see if my opinion is accurate or are you just going to be a massive prick?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not my fault if you don't understand. Go read a book.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great talk, you've done wonders for the community.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Great talk, you've done wonders for the community.

You called me a massive prick dude. Don't dish it out if you can't take it back.

It's not that hard a concept. I even posted a picture. Do you really think technology is not being developed and implemented faster today than the 18th century?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think the incentive is incredibly asymmetrical.

Everyone wants a tractor to help them plow the field, not everyone wants to do carbon capture.

I'll go read that book now lol

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I thought you said you are going to be dead in a few weeks. Then I reread it, and still pretty much think the same.

load more comments (34 replies)