this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
619 points (98.0% liked)

Work Reform

10045 readers
1082 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HappycamperNZ -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Low unemployment is a good thing- to a certain percentage (3% i think?). Not 0%.

People are arguing saying we expect some people living it tents - no, we expect to have people unemployed for a short time while they swap jobs, or seasonal workers out of season, or new grads looking for their first role.

[–] DDNB 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A good thing for who exactly?

[–] HappycamperNZ 1 points 1 year ago

Uh... people and the economy??? To copy paste my other comment

I'll happy tell a new grad they don't have to work full time in a minimum wage job while they work through the process of acquiring their first post-grad role, or the student to enjoy their gap year traveling the country. Happily tell the seasonal worker who did 15 hour days over summer they made enough to have 6 months off. The stay at home parent that they are doing a good thing even though they aren't getting paid for it, or the person transferring between jobs that they don't have to start the day after resigning from their other role.

[–] spez_ 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HappycamperNZ 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Happy to. I'll happy tell a new grad they don't have to work full time in a minimum wage job while they work through the process of acquiring their first post-grad role, or the student to enjoy their gap year traveling the country. Happily tell the seasonal worker who did 15 hour days over summer they made enough to have 6 months off. The stay at home parent that they are doing a good thing even though they aren't getting paid for it, or the person transferring between jobs that they don't have to start the day after resigning from their other role. Do you want to tell them all to get back into paid employment right now to keep unemployment at 0%?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a difference between unemployed but needing to work in order to afford food and shelter, and unemployed but being able to stay out of the workforce for a while. A lot of people need work but can't find any. Certain degrees of unemployment are fine if those who can't find work are taken care of, through a social safety net and similar.

[–] HappycamperNZ 1 points 1 year ago

Correct - but the unemployment rate doesn't take that into account.

I lie, I gave a few bad examples. Those of working age but not looking (like the SAHP) are out of workforce and not included in unemployment rate. But seasonal, grads looking for the right job and those transferring between jobs are still unemployed and form that 3% i mentioned. The other type (structural unemployment) that relates to not having the skills that employers search for we should have as close to 0% as possible and that part is a concern.