this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
619 points (98.0% liked)

Work Reform

10045 readers
1107 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlternatePersonMan 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would argue that "these working professionals" are not paid accordingly. If you're expecting more of them, pay more. Top talent tends to go where the money is.

If you're wondering where the money should come from, see: out of touch billionaires.

[–] HappycamperNZ 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't want to go into too much detail, but 1.5 times the countries median wage - not minimum, not living, 1.5 times the countries average income - should be enough to get people to be able to answer a phone and respond to basic emails in a timely matter (like, 24 hours) when people's lives and financial security are on the line.

This isn't a top-talent argument - its acting with a basic sense of actually doing work while you are being paid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends entirely on the cost of living in that country.

If even 2 times the average income is not enough to sustain a comfortable living, then it is still not worth it to work. And that country is shit.

An entire country can underpay all their workers when the employers are greedy cunts.

[–] HappycamperNZ 1 points 1 year ago

While you have a valid arguement in this example 1.5 times median is about 60% above living wage.