this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
336 points (95.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3530 readers
93 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Your first point assumes women need as much food as men. This isn't true, women need significantly less food due to their smaller size and lower metabolism on average.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

There's actually a double-edged sword on this point - women consume fewer calories under ordinary circumstances, but when building muscle, have comparable food requirements to men. Due to hormonal differences, women lose muscle faster than men, which adds an additional time requirement for maintaining physical condition, and makes food shortages much worse with regards to decreasing combat efficacy. Not only that, but there are other issues of logistics - keeping troops clothed, shoed, etc - that would unambiguously suffer from the '10% less effective' problem without any significant offset.