this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
605 points (97.3% liked)

World News

32375 readers
879 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But the recounting of the incident is a reminder of how SpaceX — and its founder — amassed enormous power and leverage as its competitors proved incapable of keeping up with a dizzying pace of innovation.

“One of the advantages is the huge amount of innovation coming out of the private sector, which the government wants to leverage to stay ahead of China and others,” said Brian Weeden, the director of program planning at the Secure World Foundation, a think tank.

SpaceX started providing Starlink internet service to Ukraine after Russia’s invasion, creating a lifeline for the country when its communications systems had largely been knocked out.

“Despite being the launch provider with the most proven track record and the lowest prices in the industry, SpaceX was seemingly not considered by Amazon,” the suit alleges.

“SpaceX has been truly innovative in several key areas, launch and large constellation broadband internet — two things people have long dreamed of but have been tried and failed before,” Weeden said.

A good portion of that success stems from Musk himself, who works relentlessly and pushes his teams to as well, attempting to overcome seemingly insurmountable odds.


The original article contains 1,360 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] whileloop 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow...this summary had almost nothing to do with Ukraine...

Sorry bot, you usually do a good job, but not this time.

[–] Sonicdemon86 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article has very little to say about starlink being turned off. It seems to be more about SpaceX and musk, instead of Ukraine.

[–] whileloop 2 points 1 year ago

Good bot. Bad Washington Post.

load more comments (1 replies)