this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
163 points (87.2% liked)

/kbin meta

639 readers
1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago
 

The mods there have decided to allow underage looking content, skirting close to CP. Unless we want such disgusting stuff on our feed, I think we should defederate from that instance.

Pinging @ernest as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Falmarri 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So if I draw some random character having sex, and then label them as "15 years old", it's now illegal? What kind of insane nonsense is that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

idiots will look at obviously mature anime characters and then cry at the canonical age being 15. but in the same breath cry about characters who are canonically adults merely for looking young/youthful. it's hypocritical and idiotic.

[–] Falmarri 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It gets even crazier in the furry world. People arguing over whether the animated bird is under or over 18. It's like wtf.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

if the bird has boobs it's an adult, clearly /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know any case law, but probably!

I think it's usually not too much of a legal concern, but it's also not uncommon for people to draw lewds of characters from shows that are canonically underage (see: Prisma Ilya, who is 10/11 in that spinoff series, although "18" in other Fate series). That would certainly be illegal.

But either way, it definitely creeps people out, and it's usually best to avoid doing things that make people want to stay away from you like that.

[–] Falmarri 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would certainly be illegal.

If that's the case then the law is nonsense.

and it’s usually best to avoid doing things that make people want to stay away from you like that.

So that means I shouldn't defend anyone doing something legal and without hurting anyone? No thanks

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

doing something legal

I mean it's explicitly illegal in this case.

But I'm only talking about what's best for lemmynsfw and kbin. I don't personally think loli/shota porn is particularly dangerous for children (and, if anything, potentially gives those people a non-harmful constructive outlet) but I also don't get to choose which pearls most people decide to clutch.

[–] Falmarri 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe it's illegal where you live. But that's on you. Lots of things are stupidly illegal in lots of places. Do we ban those everywhere too?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The place where you live is less relevant than the place where kbin lives. The servers are bound by the law of the country where they exist. If something on kbin violates Iranian law, no big deal. If something on kbin violates Polish law, big deal. If it violates US law but not Polish law, that's only a big deal if you as a user are US based.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Fwiw I'm in this thread for discussing policies of Lemmy instances, not ethics of rule of law.