this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
462 points (98.1% liked)
Work Reform
10041 readers
234 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes that is one of the things he talks about, among many. funny enough he only mentions the word politician once when talking about miners and doesn't call them rich men. almost as if he wrote the song that way on purpose. Which is why it's so damn popular with people of all classes, colors, and political leanings.
He mentions politicians every time the chorus comes around. That is what "rich men north of Richmond" means. That's why he isn't calling out wealthy people south of Richmond. DC is north of Richmond.
I can't tell you why the song is popular, but I can definitely parse the meaning of the lyrics, which you seem to be struggling with.
This is explicitly about politicians. The entire song is.
The only other lyrics with any content are
Lambasting "welfare queens" and taxes.
Needless to say, this song isn't popular with me, because I am capable of understanding both the lyrics and how taxes and welfare work within the context of the economy.
At no point does he decry wealthy business owners or anything of the sort, which sort of takes away from your "any political leanings" argument. This is very explicitly one political leaning, and from a person who isn't very knowledgeable.
As i said in my comment, he mentions politicians 1 time. You can't think of any other rich cities north or Richmond? Because i can think of a couple. If you choose to read between the lines and interpret it in only a way that you don't like, then that's on you.
Those rich cities aren't taxing people.
This is just basic understanding of verse man, not sure how else to help you. You are absolutely incorrect here.
Huh, I really need to move to those cities that don't tax people!
They aren't taxing people where he lives. I suppose it was wrong of me to assume you'd understand that since these lyrics are challenging for you.
That's the cool thing about music. The song isn't just about him and where he lives. it can be about anyone, anywhere. Art is hard though, I know.
Art can be interpreted, yes, but if I look at a picture of the Mona Lisa and think it is an excellent painting of a duck, I am incorrect.
There is, in fact, a correct way to interpret poetry and verse. I should know, because I literally have a degree in it and used to teach high school English.
The specifics of this song are not open to interpretation - it is a song about how the federal government gives "hard working men's" tax dollars to "undeserving" people on welfare.
By the same token, Taylor Swift's "Cruel Summer" is not about global warming.
It's okay to be wrong and it is a sign of self-confidence and intelligence to accept when you are wrong.
You can still enjoy the song if the actual meaning makes you feel good, or even if you just think it's a banger. No one is trying to take that from you.
Agreed it is OK to be wrong. He does say after all "people like me, and people like you". There's the 1 line about politicians and the rest is about everyone.