this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
2 points (62.5% liked)
Waterloo
303 readers
3 users here now
Discussing the Waterloo Region
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't really feel qualified to weigh in on the ethics of selling a Nazi uniform -- if that's profiting from genocide (and yeah, it probably is), then why isn't it also to sell the WW2 uniform of another country, that only exists because of that same genocide? As if genocide was the only atrocity committed... -- but the quote from the staff really pissed me off:
Opposing uniforms were not attempting genocide as far as I'm aware.
In my view it is fine, it's a piece of history. History is doomed to repeat itself if we don't acknowledge and remember the past. It's all about what you do with it. If someone buys it and wears it around yelling slurs at people.. yeah, not great, but if they put it on display as part of a collection of ww2 items, whatever. It's kind of like buying a gun to shoot up a school or having one on display.
WW2 was honestly just one genocide after another, you couldn't wear a uniform if you don't want to support some type
If they were opposing genocide, then isn't trading in the artifacts of that conflict, whatever the nation, still profiting from genocide? I don't see how it matters what side the artifacts come from.