this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)
Doomers
296 readers
1 users here now
Musings and discussion surrounding the end of human civilization
Guidelines:
- Anyone can post
- Keep discussion civil and be respectful of others
- Keep content on-topic
- Appropriately label any NSFW content
- Do not post bigoted or hateful speech, nor incite violence or encourage criminal behavior
- Do not harass others
- Do not post extreme or offensive content
- Violations of any guideline will be subject to removal of post, public or private admonition, or temporary or permanent user removal at the discretion of any moderator
- Spam will be removed
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thank you. Yours may be a less cynical view concerning publicly available scientific thought.
It occurs to me that more realistic study results can lead to fewer funding opportunities.
There's also the error bars.
Scientists will determine that the temperature will rise by between 1°C and 6°C. That's a big range. Climate change is complicated and it's impossible to account for all of the variables.
To the scientist (and their colleagues) they'll know that 3°C is most likely, and this type of paper reads like a dire warning... but when the news breaks, it goes. One of two ways:
"1-6°C is a huge range, scientists must not know what's going on. What does this even mean?"
"Scientists report that temperature will rise by at least 1°C, the UN Council on Blah Blah says that we should keep under 1.5°C..."
It's maddening, really. Most of the scientists I know are doomers.