Actually Useful AI
Welcome! ๐ค
Our community focuses on programming-oriented, hype-free discussion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) topics. We aim to curate content that truly contributes to the understanding and practical application of AI, making it, as the name suggests, "actually useful" for developers and enthusiasts alike.
Be an active member! ๐
We highly value participation in our community. Whether it's asking questions, sharing insights, or sparking new discussions, your engagement helps us all grow.
What can I post? ๐
In general, anything related to AI is acceptable. However, we encourage you to strive for high-quality content.
What is not allowed? ๐ซ
- ๐ Sensationalism: "How I made $1000 in 30 minutes using ChatGPT - the answer will surprise you!"
- โป๏ธ Recycled Content: "Ultimate ChatGPT Prompting Guide" that is the 10,000th variation on "As a (role), explain (thing) in (style)"
- ๐ฎ Blogspam: Anything the mods consider crypto/AI bro success porn sigma grindset blogspam
General Rules ๐
Members are expected to engage in on-topic discussions, and exhibit mature, respectful behavior. Those who fail to uphold these standards may find their posts or comments removed, with repeat offenders potentially facing a permanent ban.
While we appreciate focus, a little humor and off-topic banter, when tasteful and relevant, can also add flavor to our discussions.
Related Communities ๐
General
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Chat
Image
Open Source
Please message @[email protected] if you would like us to add a community to this list.
Icon base by Lord Berandas under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
view the rest of the comments
Itโs insane not in the sense of the AI itself being insane (because, as you said it, it predicted a likely path for the conversation, so it behaved correctly), but the conversation still reads like the ramblings of an insane person, highlighting a problem with using LLMs in commercial applications.
Absolutely. I love LLMs but the real insanity is thinking they are ready to be baked into professional products. I really want the technology to succeed because in certain circumstances they are really helpful. But when I hear Mercedes is putting ChatGPT into a car, or the support group that fired their workers and replaced them with AI (with predictable results) I just shake my head. This technology is not to be relied on without supervision and this whole endeavor is going to burst because everyone is racing to be the first to have it without considering the negatives.
I use it to help me code. I've been a professional for twenty-five years, but I can't remember every best practice or anti-pattern. So I ask for some generic code and I almost always get back something totally wrong but it starts me on the right path and helps avoid the initial decision paralysis of trying to figure out the best approach. It's not even always right about the best approach, but it probably does about as well as I do and a lot faster so I can find the mistake more quickly and find the better solution armed with the knowledge of why that was a mistake. It's very useful.
But anyone thinking they can replace developers with AI is nuts. Maybe a slightly smaller junior developer headcount with more efficient seniors, but it's not going to be a stark difference.