this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
163 points (87.2% liked)

/kbin meta

639 readers
1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 2 years ago
 

The mods there have decided to allow underage looking content, skirting close to CP. Unless we want such disgusting stuff on our feed, I think we should defederate from that instance.

Pinging @ernest as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Michelangelo's David is pornography in a lot of places. let's forbid it everywhere

[–] HERRAX 15 points 1 year ago

Why not just create a separate account for nsfw stuff? Why would you need it on the front page of your main account while scrolling anyways?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's flip that argument: should we all abide by American standards? After all, nudity is ok in a lot of places in the world, why should we blur chests?

Tons of countries ban underage looking things, even digital art of it. Countries with bans include Canada, Australia, the UK, France, South Korea, Ireland, Norway, etc.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And, uh, Poland. You know. That place where ernest is from, and whose laws he's beholden to.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We're not talking about pornography laws that were enacted with no basis in harm reduction, we're talking about child porn laws that were enacted to not encourage and normalize pedophiles and pedophilia.

Some laws are justifiable, some are arguable, and some are completely unjustifiable, throwing out an unjustifiable one in contrast to a firmly justifiable one is not debating, it's childish nonsense.

[–] Falmarri 1 points 1 year ago

We’re not talking about pornography laws that were enacted with no basis in harm reduction, we’re talking about child porn laws that were enacted to not encourage and normalize pedophiles and pedophilia.

Wtf? There's evidence that letting pedophiles look at fictional drawings prevents them from acting on their impulses. EXACTLY harm reduction. What else would it be? You seriously think someone would be normal, then come across an anime loli, and think "oh shit, I should go abuse a kid!". Wtf kind of nonsense is that? It's the exact argument about violent video games

throwing out an unjustifiable one in contrast to a firmly justifiable one is not debating

Then justify it. Where's the evidence that looking at loli pron leads to abusing children.