this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023

169 points (64.6% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29179 readers

7 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.

Report contact

DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport
Email [email protected] (PGP Supported)

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Join the team

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

169

Defederate lemmynsfw.com? (self.lemmyworld)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by CosmicGiraffe to c/lemmyworld

162 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The admins on lemmynsfw.com have decided to allow "non-IRL loli", i.e. drawn porn involving children/teenagers. (Post: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/29633).

Irrelevant of the moral issues that this poses, such content is illegal in many countries (e.g the UK). Continuing to federate with lemmynsfw.com will put users at risk of significant legal repercussions.

Please would the admins consider defederating unless lemmynsfw change their policy.

UPDATE: The lemmynsfw admins posted an clarification here: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/29826. My original argument for defederating doesn't stand any more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] redeyedstranger 89 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

I wish there was a way to exclude the whole instance from my personal feed without requiring admins to defederate it. Right now I have to play whackamole with new communities popping up. And it's not just the NSFW stuff.

[–] ulu_mulu 77 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I'm taking the opposite approach, that is, instead of blocking what I don't want to see, I join what I do want to see.

Blocking is not effective if you want a "curated" feed IMO, new communities are being created all the time, especially now that many are migrating over from reddit, you might never "end" blocking stuff.

OP post is a different situation though, that kind of content is illegal in many countries (especially EU), just being federated with them could pose a legal risk, it's not just stuff some people don't want to see.

[–] CosmicGiraffe 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I've been browsing through new as a way of finding communities to join. The NSFW stuff in that feed is unideal but easy enough to ignore, whereas content that could send me to jail is a whole different ballgame.

[–] Wolfric1982 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You should make a correction because your original post isn't true

https://lemmynsfw.com/post/29826

[–] ulu_mulu 5 points 2 years ago

https://www.europol.europa.eu/crime-areas-and-statistics/crime-areas/child-sexual-exploitation

quote:

Child sexual exploitation refers to the sexual abuse of a person below the age of 18, as well as to the production of images of such abuse and the sharing of those images online.

Your post clarifies they ban content of "youngsters" being not obviously underage, it's not the same legally as to say someone is 18+ years old.

[–] ulu_mulu 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

whereas content that could send me to jail is a whole different ballgame

Exactly. And as someone else already pointed out, it just takes a single user subscribing there to have that content cached here, that would put all of us at risk from a legal point of view.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (9 replies)