this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2021
0 points (NaN% liked)
General Programming Discussion
7785 readers
1 users here now
A general programming discussion community.
Rules:
- Be civil.
- Please start discussions that spark conversation
Other communities
Systems
Functional Programming
Also related
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Once I was checking somebody's code against a coding style and asked him why he capitalised a certain identifier that wasn't a type. His reply was along these lines: This word is a German noun. In the German language all nouns are capitalised. It is better to have the identifier look like the real word, because it uses less cognitive resources. Your IDE can tell you about the nature of the identifier. Your name should only reflect how it is used.
I kinda liked the idea (and maybe forced him to conform to the rule, I don't remember). In the end I've come to appreciate, when you can use identifiers that really look like normal text.
And I hate if the compiler allows to have different identifiers that only differ in case. E.g. "RailsExpr" and "railSexPR" shouldn't be allowed coexist in the same code. (Neither should indentation with tabs and indentation with space coexist in the same file).