this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
705 points (94.6% liked)

Google Pixel

5831 readers
2 users here now

The World's Google Pixel community!

This community is for lemmings to gather and discuss all things related to the Google Pixel phone and other related hardware. Feel free to ask questions, seek advice, and engage in discussions around the Pixel and its ecosystem.

We ask you to be polite when addressing others and respect Lemmy.world's rules.

NSFW content is not allowed and will immediately get you banned.

It also goes without saying that self-promotion of any nature and referral links are not allowed. When in doubt, contact the mod team first.

Also, please, no politics.

For more general Android discussions, see [email protected].

This community is not in any way affiliated with Google. If you are looking for customer support regarding your Pixel phone, look here instead: https://support.google.com/pixelphone/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
705
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by dog_ to c/googlepixel
 

https://gizmodo.com/google-s-pixel-8-sim-slot-esim-only-iphone-1850759671

What happened to daring to be different? What happened to having options? What happened to creativity?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Since physical sims are well physical items. They create ewaste. Whereas esim which is not a physical item, doesn't.

Just embrace better technology

[–] telllos 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't there a designated chip for the esim? From what I found, it looks like it is a physical Item too. We could of course argue that standard sim require a sim reader on the phone.

But the possibility to replace a SIM if defective without replacing the whole phone is an advantage. You can also swap sim really easily when travelling.

[–] XGC75 1 points 1 year ago

But the esim doesn't need to be at the edge of the phone body. It enables significant simplification in layout design.

load more comments (11 replies)