this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
8 points (90.0% liked)
Science
1224 readers
5 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
~~That~~ The sad thing is, that we are not lacking in any ideas on how to fight greenhouse gase, but that fact that non (or too little) ~~a~~ are put into action.
Nevertheless, this sound interesting.
Yep, the sub-heading of the article pretty much sums it up:
The problem is that no company is gonna put forth the investment required if they aren't forced to do it. And most governments don't dare (or are too complacent / corrupt) to actually force them to do it.
This reminds me of a podcast I heard a while back about waste recycling in germany - where there is basically a fully fledged out plan for waste separation coupled to energy generation (or something like that), but no company wants to invest or switch…
Yeah at this point every discovery about a new way to manage it just feels like the news networks are trying to say "See everything will be fine, they are figuring it out. No need to worry, go back to your lives and don't bother demanding change."
Exactly! It’s basically “we can choose how to save earth - we have sooo many possibilities”.