I a a high school student and realised I just improved the PNSR score of Uformer-B on the SIDD de-noising and Gopro de-blurring datasets by about 1db. The same change to training dehazeformer. At least from the first 15 epochs of each training (I am planning on renting an a100 for full training soon).

Is it worth publishing after I have fully trained it or should I further try and further improve it? Also, what does the process of actually publishing look like?

I have reached out to local universities but I was ghosted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Publish on arxiv. It’s free and they have really well documented guidelines. Plenty of incredibly well respected ML experts publish there.

[–] original2 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would the results I have found be significant enough to publish yet?

[–] Blaed 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In my opinion writing a paper is good practice no matter the results. It might help you discern more valuable insights from your testing or approach.

In this situation, you have almost nothing to lose! I say go for it. Do both. Start a paper draft now and iterate upon it as you benchmark more results. Often times writing and reflecting on your own research reinforces some of the concepts you're tackling. All the more reason to write something up, even if you don't release it.

If you do end up writing one, be sure to share it here!

load more comments (1 replies)