this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
79 points (98.8% liked)

SNOOcalypse - document, discuss, and promote the downfall of Reddit.

1337 readers
1 users here now

SNOOcalypse is closing down. If you wish to talk about Reddit, check out [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected].


This community welcomes anyone who wants to see Reddit gone. Nuke the Snoo!

When sharing links, please also share an archived version of the target of your link.

Rules:

  1. Follow lemmy.ml's global rules and code of conduct.
  2. Keep it on-topic.
  3. Don't promote illegal stuff here.
  4. Don't be stupid, noisy, obnoxious or obtuse (S.N.O.O.)
  5. Have fun, and enjoy the popcorn! 🍿

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

I feel like having people vote on moderators would be an improvement but how can you complain about the lack of democracy when you are literally Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I really disagree, moderators need to make unpopular decisions sometimes to keep communities intact. Online polls are notoriously easy to game as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

On /r/moderatepolitics, our usual practice is a proposal combined with a request for comment thread. We then try to shape the final policy change more or less around what the community wants. But that doesn't always exactly happen. Sometimes there's no clear consensus or even just simple majority. Other times, we go against the prevailing opinion because it causes a severe problem. We then convene as a mod team and take a vote.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If the users want to kill their own community with bad decisions, that is their right. A mod shouldn't get to stop it.

load more comments (6 replies)