this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
44 points (92.3% liked)

Personal Finance

3825 readers
1 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Intro

When it comes to paying off debt, the most important thing is to get your budget in order to free up cash to actually make the payments. So if you're not there yet, stop here and work on getting your budget in order.

In this post, I'll go through the two major debt repayment strategies with their associated pros and cons, and at the end I'll discuss one potentially surprising case where it's not so cut and dry which is better. In general, these strategies attempt to optimize how quickly you pay off your debts.

How does interest work

In general, your interest rate is a yearly rate, but interest usually accrues monthly (or daily for credit cards; more on that later). So let's say your interest rate is 12%, this means your monthly rate is ~1%, so every month you'd pay 1% of whatever money you owe in interest (so $10 for every $1000). It's a little more complicated than that (i.e. APR vs APY), but that's close enough for our purposes.

For this post, I'm going to be using the following for illustration purposes:

  • credit card A: $1000 @ 24%
  • credit card B: $500 @ 12%
  • debt repayment of $200/month
  • minimum repayment: 1% or $50, whichever is greater

So in the first month, here's how much interest we'll be paying:

  • credit card A: $1000 * (24%/12) = $20
  • credit card B: $500 * (12%/12) = $5

Since we have a minimum payment of $50 for each card, the rest will go toward reducing the debt. So after the first month, if we only make minimum payments, the debts will be:

  • credit card A: $1000 - $30 = $970
  • credit card B: $500 - 45 = $455

For the examples below, I'll be making extra payments with the payment, after interest accrues. I'll also assume interest accrues as of the balance at the end of the month, not daily.

Grace period

The most common type of higher interest debt is credit card debt, and usually these rates (in my area) are between 10-30%, usually >20%. Credit cards are a bit special in that they usually (but not always!) have a grace period where you won't pay any interest if you always pay your balance on time, but as soon as you fail to pay your statement balance even once, you start accruing daily interest on all balances (including new purchases) until the entire debt is repaid. So credit card interest is especially insidious because whether you pay interest can change each billing cycle.

This grace period can be violated in a number of ways, and each card may be a little different there. In general, cash advances start accruing daily interest immediately, balance transfers have a separate rate from normal purchases, and payments usually go toward the highest interest portion first (so usually toward new purchase).

The grace period will be relevant later, but I'll be ignoring it for now.

Avalanche Method

In short: highest interest first.

Assuming your debt repayment stays constant, this is the mathematically optimal repayment strategy and will save you the most interest.

One way of conceptualizing this is to find the average interest rate. We do this by adding up all the debts, divide each debt by the total debt, multiply that by the interest rate, and then sum that. That's a little complicated in text, so here's a walk through of how that works:

  1. $1000 + $500 = $1500 - $1500 total debt
  2. for debt A: $1000 / 1500 * 24% = 16%
  3. for debt B: $500 / 1500 * 12% = 4%
  4. average debt: 16% + 0.04 = 20%

If you don't trust my math, here's an online calculator.

So on average, we're paying 20% interest on our debts. If I paid down half of debt A, I'd instead be paying 18% average interest. If I paid down all of debt B, I'd be paying 24% average interest.

Let's walk through our example, every extra penny goes toward the highest interest debt.

  1. interest paid: $1000*(24%/12) + 500*(12%/12) = $25; card A balance: $1000*(1 + 24%/12) - $150 = $870; card B balance = $500*(1 + 12%/12) - 50 = $455
  2. interest paid: $21.95, card A balance: $737.40; card B balance: $410.31
  3. interest paid: $18.85, card A balance: $602.15, card B balance: $365.10

Total payoff time: 7 months
Total interest: $110.70

Snowball Method

In short: lowest balance first.

The goal here is to eliminate as many debts/minimum payments as possible to reduce the number of debt payments. This can be a huge psychological boost which can encourage people to cut more from the budget to accelerate debt repayment.

Let's walk through our example:

  1. interest paid: $25, card A balance: $970.00, card B balance: $355.00
  2. interest paid: $22.95, card A balance: $939.40, card B balance: $208.55
  3. interest paid: $20.87, card A balance: $868.82, card B balance: $60.64qq`

Total payoff time: 7 months
Total interest: $113.85

Spreadsheet

Here is a spreadsheet I've made that details the simple case above, as well as a more complicated case.

Both cases are intended for illustrative purposes only, I don't recommend using this sheet for anything more than a high-level understanding of snowball vs avalanche debt repayment strategies.

Corner case - unexpected expense

The second tab in that spreadsheet goes through a corner case where snowball could actually be more advantageous. Here are the assumptions:

  • one high interest, high balance card
  • multiple lower interest, low balance cards
  • unexpected expense higher than cash flow can handle happens 3 months after debt repayment starts
  • cards have a grace period on new purchases

In this scenario, snowball is actually superior mathematically for a few months after that unexpected expense happens, and then falls behind over the longer term.

The takeaway here is that if you have less predictable expenses, you may be better off with the debt snowball method and/or having a larger emergency fund. The general advice when doing debt repayment is to not make additional purchases on existing credit cards so as to not add to the problem, but life happens.

Conclusion

If you'll look at both of my examples, the total interest paid isn't that different. If you want to play with the numbers yourself with a better designed tool, check out unbury.me and enter all of your debts, interest rates, and minimum payments. I ran my above example through that website, and the total interest paid is <$100 different between the two methods, and both would be finished around the same time.

In general, debt avalanche is usually the optimal strategy, but use what works for you. For me, debt avalanche is the way to go because I hate leaving money on the table more than I like seeing monthly payments disappear, but the opposite is also completely sensible. That said, the more debt you have, the higher the difference between avalanche and snowball, so run the numbers before deciding.

If you'd like more posts like this, please let me know. I'd like to get more active in this community, but I don't know how technical people here would like me to get.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This was a great post.

The snowball method worked for me and my family. We were over 30 years old with good paychecks and jobs, but still somehow living paycheck to paycheck. Nothing ever got saved, we owed on two cars, school loan, and a bunch of unsecured credit card debt.

Snowballed worked for us. Something about getting aggressive and paying one all the way off - that feeling of winning - got exciting. So it was easier to go after the next one, and the one after that.

Pretty soon, we were out of debt and started to slowly build our nest egg.

I’m not a church kind of guy, but Dave Ramsey’s financial peace university was worth every penny. Just ignore the preachiness if that’s not your think.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I 100% agree. I usually recommend avalanche, but if money is super tight, getting those payments down can really have an impact.

I know Dave Ramsey isn't super popular on Reddit PF, but I've seen it work for a coworker and I like listening to success stories from time to time. I don't like his investment advice or his opinions about credit, but by the time you need to worry about that, you're already winning.

So yeah, I'm glad it worked for you!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That’s EXACTLY how it went. His basics/ 101 got us out of debt and on the same page as a couple. Those concepts provided a solid foundation to grow from. We don’t use cash anymore. We use a credit card and we use an “envelope” app so that we can see what’s left and stay aligned. We pay of everything every two weeks. His investment advice is just dumb, but I have to give him credit for giving us the tools that finally worked.

A blow money envelope and being able to shift money around after having a budget meeting was THE game changer.