this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
53 points (92.1% liked)

Random Old Memes and ✨Stuff✨

152 readers
1 users here now

Got sick of bigots, and pedants, and trying to figure out if something is “meme enough” to count, and of feeling like I’m spamming other spaces, and very quickly of the lemmy UI too (still love you blahaj.zone!) so am opening my own space where I can make my own rules and post my collection in peace. ❗BE WARNED: SOME OF THE IMAGES YOU SEE HERE MAY NOT TECHNICALLY BE MEMES❗ Now that we got that out of the way, let the infodump commence! Expect a mix of slightly outdated: mostly leftist (but never tankie) content, many cats, and some general old memes I’ve collected over the years. There are many, so will try to mix it up! Update: looks like 🐝Beehaw🐝 have banned this magazine. If you want real leftism rather than "nice" (more like "unchallenging to the status quo and the comfort of libs") leftism, I guess you'll have to follow from elsewhere!

founded 1 year ago
 

top: PERCEPTION

a line marked FAR LEFT, LEFT, CENTER, RIGHT, FAR RIGHT
above the line in order from left to right are the following faces: Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden who is above "centre", Jeb Bush, Mitch McConnell, Donald Trump, and Stephen Miller

bottom: REALITY

the line is tipped to the right, the faces falling off the right end. Bernie Sanders is now just left of centre and Elizabeth Warren just to the right, the empty space left behind Sanders to the left is labelled "WATCH THIS SPACE"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And it all started when Hilary Clinton said "I don't like to call myself a liberal. I like to call myself a progressive."

Big ol Republican disguised in hubbies political affiliation, and Democrats ate it up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lmfao that you think any of this started with Hillary, that's adorable...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean sure, go back far enough and Democrats were literally the right wing part.

I'm talking about the start of this swap iteration.

Democrats were liberal under at least as far back as Carter. Hilary made them "progressive".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think half of those words mean what you think they do lol.

Either way, both teams play for the same manager, always have, call them whatever you want if it makes you feel better, but voting for either is voting for capitalism and maintaining the status quo.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Okay, well, I 100% agree with you here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, agreed, but claiming that historically both sides were the same I think is doing certain administrations a disservice. The New Deal and Great Society, while obviously working within a capitalist system, were radical and anti-free market. Using make-work to help unemployed workers provide for their families while setting up state-owned hydroelectricity projects (Tennessee Valley Authority, which was not without its problems re use of native lands of course), or setting up Medicare and Medicaid, are both unequivocally schemes that many leftists would support (though obviously like to see go further).

I worry that 'both sides' rhetoric results in 'all or nothing' style political apathy that allows the overton window to be dragged inexorably right. We have had better leaders, and we can have better leaders in future, than we currently do have, and they do make a material impact on people's lives when they do get into power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It is being placated by crumbs like you mentioned that moves the overtone window, not demanding an and to a two puppet system that serves to give us the illusion of choice while it continues to oppress and exploit us.
Liberalism enables fascism.