Facepalm

2656 readers

2 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Anticorp

181

Educators ‘outraged’ after attorneys argue 1st-grade teacher shot in school is ‘workplace injury’ (www.denverpost.com)

submitted 1 year ago by DevCat to c/facepalm

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

NEWPORT NEWS — The Newport News Education Association President condemned the premise of the school division’s motion to dismiss Abigail Zwerner’s pending $40 million lawsuit.

The motion was filed last week by attorneys representing the School Board and argues that Zwerner, who was shot in her classroom at Richneck Elementary in January by a 6-year-old student, is only entitled to file a worker’s compensation claim because the injury she sustained from the shooting is a “workplace injury,” and that the shooting was a hazard of the job.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So your contention is that a child should be allowed to remain at school until they pull a gun? All behaviour up to attempted murder should be tolerated. Gotcha, understood, thank fuck I went to school 30 years ago where school shootings weren't a "reasonable expectation". This child has been failed by everyone in their home and community, just like every other mentally disturbed child who shoots up their school. You do know there are schools for dis-regulated children right? You don't have to expose every other child and teacher to them.

A Virginia first-grade school teacher who was shot in her classroom by a 6-year-old student filed a $40 million lawsuit against her school district, alleging administrators were told the boy brought a gun to school prior to the shooting and "had a history of random violence,” yet did nothing to stop him from harming her.

Are you going to say that a 6 year old bringing a gun to school should be protected by the 2nd Amendment next? It would be less of a reach than quoting the 14th to be honest.

[–] just_change_it 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you are going to take the argument that "preceding events should have caused expulsion" please provide references otherwise the argument is a lot of hot air. "Acts of random violence" in this case probably doesn't involve more than a kid having tantrums. If the kid stabbed a classmate or did something truly violent you can be sure something would have been done and it would have made the news.

No one is saying that kids should be bringing guns to school. No one even IMAGINES a six year old bringing one in!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They knew the child had a gun and did nothing. That's the lawsuit, full stop. Keep digging.