this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
7 points (88.9% liked)
Ask Biologists 🙋👨🔬 🧬
613 readers
1 users here now
Ask anything about all fields of biology. 🧪🧬🔬
We value quality over quantity.
Rules:
- Be kind, friendly and patient.
- No shitposting or other low-effort content.
- If possible, add sources.
- If possible, do some research and do not "just guess".
- No spam.
- No ads.
- No NSFW, gore, hate speech, violence, insults or trolling.
- No memes.
- Be as professional as you can, where appropriate.
You may also like:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The gaps between each rib allow you to curve your chest. If it was a solid shell, you’d be forced to keep your chest perfectly straight, which would impact mobility. Evolutionary pressures preferred mobility over a “shell-like” protection.
Having a shell like protection wasn’t that necessary in most cases. Turtles needed the protection, but mammals have been doing just fine without it. Probably the flexibility helps too.
Shells are also heavy. If an deer had a shell, it wouldn’t be as fast. Also, the shell wouldn’t really help agains wolves, so that protection would come with a lot of downsides. I guess the only real benefit would be when humans are trying to stab the chest or sides of the deer with spears and arrows.