this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
79 points (89.9% liked)

Apple

17540 readers
150 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sheltac 36 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Interesting, I always thought it had to do with Android’s ungodly software stack which at some point involves, of all things, fucking java.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Android doesn’t use Java at a byte-code level and never has, as far as I can tell. Source code was written in Java since mobile developers were so used to it but Android never ran the JVM, they do their own thing with Java source.

You can dislike Java syntax but the software stack on Android wasn’t Java’s.

[–] Sheltac 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wait, thats is very different from what I read back in the day. I know there was a point at, I dunno, android 5 where they started doing something different with java, but my impression was that android always ran a JVM of sorts. And frankly, given how it performs even on the highest-end devices, that was really easy to believe.

I guess I need to do some research now.

[–] bluefirex 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No you're correct. Android does run a JVM, just not Oracle's. That has always been the case. Back in the day it was Dalvik, nowadays it's ART.

[–] Sheltac 9 points 1 year ago

There you go, that’s exactly what I was thinking. Thanks!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)