this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
55 points (98.2% liked)

News

1751 readers
1 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 2 years ago
 

The seven-months-pregnant officer reported contraction-like pains at work, but said she wasn’t allowed to leave for hours. The anti-abortion state is fighting her lawsuit, in part by saying her fetus didn’t clearly have rights.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheObserver 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

That whole thing could have been avoided if she just left 🤷. Jobs don't give a flying fuck about you. You will be replaced in a weeks time. Worry about yourself and yourself only.

Before anyone tries to come at me saying she couldn't leave. Yes she can. Doesn't matter what rule or threat or law you come up with. If u wanna leave then leave nobody forced her to stay but her loyalty to a shitty company.

[–] Clent 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That is not always the case.

There can severe penalties if there is a contract involved.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Plus, seven months pregnant is not exactly a time that you want to risk losing your health insurance because it’s tied to your employment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Also, most places don’t want to hire someone who’s 7 months pregnant. They’ll conveniently find another applicant was the more “suitable” hire.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Totally agree, but that doesn't make it a winning argument. Clearly, there were also severe penalties for staying. She was stuck in a shitty position, but if the choices are court battle over contract/termination vs. court battle over stillbirth then perhaps a contract dispute is worth it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Holy victim blaming, Batman.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I've never seen someone attend to defend At Will employment like this before. I can't say it's a good first showing.