this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Project Priorities Observations

5 readers
1 users here now

I've raised my voice loudly on meta communities, github, and created new [email protected] and [email protected] communities.

I feel like the performance problems are being ignored for over 30 days when there are a half-dozen solutions that could be coded in 5 to 10 hours of labor by one person.

I've been developing client/server messaging apps professionally since 1984, and I firmly believe that Lemmy is currently suffering from a lack of testing by the developers and lack of concern for data loss. A basic e-mail MTA in 1993 would send a "did not deliver" message back to message sender, but Lemmy just drops delivery and there is no mention of this in the release notes//introduction on GitHub. I also find that the Lemmy developers do not like to "eat their own dog food" and actually use Lemmy's communities to discuss the ongoing development and priorities of Lemmy coding. They are not testing the code and sampling the data very much, and I am posting here, using Lemmy code, as part of my personal testing! I spent over 100 hours in June 2023 testing Lemmy technical problems, especially with performance and lost data delivery.

I'll toss it into this echo chamber.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1
2023-08-11 (bulletintree.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

"Freshness" can also mean frozen fresh ;) Canned fresh. The key concept behind Freshness is to limit the number of posts per community, but also consider that older content if "fresh frozen" is fine for small communities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

freshness can be a partial index, and a self-tuning scale under heavy load.

lemmy.world has shut down their entire front page, a more graceful response would be to limit to recent freshness value on all queries.