this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
25 points (90.3% liked)

Lemmy Moderators

761 readers
1 users here now

A community for moderators of various communities to discuss moderating. Help others and get help yourself! Remember, there are no stupid questions!

If you have general questions or things you want to share about the Fediverse, then head over to [email protected]!

If you want help with making a lemmy bot, then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello Lemmy moderators!

The Lemmy.World administrator team is planning to release a Moderator Code of Conduct for Lemmy soon.

Even though there will be some basic principles we will follow, which can be found here, we still need your valuable input. We'd like to hear your suggestions on what to add to this Code of Conduct, as you know best about what you want and need.

This Code of Conduct would lay out the official rules, set principles and goals for Lemmy.World moderators, and for any other instance that wishes to follow it.

With Love,
The Lemmy.World Administrator (Team)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rooki 18 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Ban / Remove content with a reason and put it in the reason textfield. ( So no "." or "bruh", rather "Rule 1 - Insulted a fellow member" ... )

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 15 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Avoid permanent bans and use progressive bans instead. 24 hour ban, 3 day ban, 7 day ban etc.. permanent bans just lead to the user making a different account and not learning from their mistake.

[–] TheSpookiestUser 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

I disagree with this. There are some offenses from which we can't reasonably expect people to "learn" from - bigotry, death threats, doxxing, spambotting, ban evasion. These are what permanent bans are most often handed out for anyway. If I saw someone drop a slur in my community, my vote would be to permanently ban them.

[–] 108beadz 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well—some slurs are obvious no-go. Then there are slurs that are widely used thoughtlessly in high schools. Ex.—recently saw a poster call a rule "retarded." Removed, noted "incivility, disrespectful to people with developmental disabilities." No blowback, peace restored with minimal unhappiness.

Edit: oh nuts, this my alt account. Should have posted from [email protected]. Apologies.

[–] TheSpookiestUser 0 points 1 year ago

For the record I actually agree with this. I had a similar policy toward "retarded" and the like in previous communities. Not because I thought it was "not as bad" but because it's more likely that people (especially younger people) could have incorporated this into their vocabulary passively without even really thinking about the implications. These people can learn, but most others who use slurs can't, at least not from a stranger over the internet.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)