this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
396 points (92.3% liked)
Asklemmy
43974 readers
593 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The thing is that commercial real estate investment corporations are the ones behind most of that. Individual Californians that made enough to retire on elsewhere in this country aren't responsible for the real estate prices increasing across the country. REITs are the issue here. We need to outlaw the ability for corporations to invest in residential property. We then further need rent controls and punitive property and sales taxes to disincentivize hoarding. The idea I would propose is that rent controls are strictly enforced by the IRS, and for each residential property that any individual owns, the sales and property taxes will increase by 10% for each property greater than one. This would make their tax burden, that they are unable to pass on to a potential renter, 110% for their second property, but 200% for their eleventh property.
The rent controls should be easy to implement since the landlords already have a company that uses algorithms to charge the most rent possible, it should be easy to cap rent to 1/4 of the Mode Wage of the area.
Nothing wrong with nativism. If you don't like where you live change it. Don't go somewhere else and try the same shit that made you hate where you were.
Sorry but it’s very uncommon for the people who are making a place into somewhere that the underprivileged hate to be the same people that are moving to other places.
If you’ve got the power to drive up housing prices in the state that you currently live in, you’re not going to be in the group that’s moving across the country to have a shot at being successful.
Of course when people can’t earn enough to be successful in CA and move to CO for a better life, the uncreased housing demand in CO is going to bring prices up a bit. But those people aren’t the ones who made CA so expensive. In fact, they’re actively making it less expensive by leaving the state.
They and their compatriots certainly did vote for the politicians that stopped the police doing any work. That's what I was talking about.
Which CA ballot initiative are you talking about stops the police from doing their work?
Proposition 47.
Are you mixed up? Prop 47 reduces jail time for nonviolent and non serious drug and property crimes.
Seems pretty disingenuous to represent that as preventing the police from doing their jobs. Unless you honestly think cops’ job is to maximize the amount of time that drug addicts spend in jail.
It basically decriminalized theft under $950. The cops are not investigating misdemeanor thefts because it's so rampant. And if they do they catch and release because the DAs don't press charges.
That is false.
Cops aren’t investigating misdemeanor thefts for the same reason that they don’t investigate anything that they’re not forced to. They don’t care.
It’s funny that you blame prop 47 for the fact that cops are refusing to enforce prop 47.