UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1239 readers

1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

[email protected]

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone

HM05_Me

Seth Shostak, the senior astronomer for the SETI Institute, shares his thoughts. (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by SignullGone to c/uap

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I understand what you mean, I thing the Kardashev scale is useful to put it in a perspective beyond dollars or even workhours.

extaordinary evidence and we have none.

None that we, the public, are aware of. Whether or not one consider a cover-up plausible is a bigger discussion. According to the latest ~~whispers~~ shouts in Washington, there's quite a lot more. What's your impression of Grusch, the UFO whistleblower?

aliens still have to obey the known laws of physics.

I absolutely agree. But maybe we have a differing point of view on our knowledge... Would you say that we understand the universe to the point where we can exclude any significant further discoveries that would transform our understanding of physics?