this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
4 points (83.3% liked)
Books
526 readers
1 users here now
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I resonate with a lot of what you're saying, and yeah, I don't think I'll feel too guilty about taking a break or two since I can get back on it whenever I want.
My one problem with the amount of footnotes is that they can be so dense and cumbersome that the stream of consciousness sections didn't even feel like a stream of anything: it was like when you repeat a word so often you start losing your grip on what the word itself is. Of course they're helpful to an extent, a considerable one on a work like this one, but if this books was so wild and innovative when it came out I want to feel some of that!
Also, thanks for the recommendation! It sounds like something I'd really enjoy
I suspect that there was a little bit of an element of A Brief History Of Time about it, crossed in with the fact it was known to have 'dirty' bits in - lots of people bought it but how many people read it cover to cover is questionable. So I'm sure a lot of people when it came out were just skipping to the interesting bits as well, or just putting it on their shelves to show off their bohemian credentials!
It has genuinely funny passages, genuinely brilliant experimental pieces and lots of bits which are quite boring. That's the thing about experimental literature - I find the same with William Burroughs as well - you have to wade through the experiments that didn't work to find the bits that did. I've always been more interested in experimentation with storytelling devices like breaking the fourth wall and so on than the stream of consciousness experimentation which feels easy on the writer and hard on the reader.