Asklemmy

43958 readers

2044 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

155

Is there anything that only the rich can currently afford but that everyone will have in the future? (lemmy.one)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

161 comments fedilink hide all child comments

When the very first cars were built, only the rich could afford it, but now a large part of the population (in developed countries) has one or more.

What do you think will be such an evolution in the future?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, that's on the iPhone side, which was lagging significantly behind Android at that time. 2013 was the Galaxy S4, which had LTE (still good today), all the same sensors phones have today, 1080p screen, 4k video recording, 13 megapixel camera, and 802.11ac (5GHz) wifi. It even had a headphone jack, micro SD card reader, and a removable battery, which is better than most phones now.

Drawbacks are that the RAM was low (2GB), the CPU is old, and the version of Android hasn't been updated in a very long time.

The only thing that has really upgraded in the last 10 years for Android phones is that that the RAM, CPU, and camera get incrementally better each year. There hasn't been a new technology or feature that I have cared about or wanted since then. And honestly, I feel like the camera was good enough 10 years ago as well. I couldn't care less if the camera on my current phone was the same as the Galaxy S4 camera.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only thing that has really upgraded in the last 10 years for Android phones is that that the RAM, CPU, and camera get incrementally better each year.

I mean yeah, that's a pretty sizable improvement overall. Improvements don't have to be jew gimmicks in every new phone. They can just be steady, incremental upgrades, and over time there's a pretty noticeable impact.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My point is that it isn't a reason for me to go out and get a new phone every year. Or even when the phones are planned to go obsolete after 2 years. Maybe after 5 or 6 years, but definitely not 2. It's not because of new technology that I want that I get new phones. I get new phones because the phones are designed to completely fall apart after 2 years.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I'm curious where multiple people in my responses got 1/2 year replacement cycles from, considering all I said is that I don't need eternal durability.