I think now is a great time to remind everyone, like sync's developer, Lemmy's developers need to be paid too! The amount of time all the devs put into making lemmy exist, in my opinion, should be worth some of your money. If you can afford it, donating to the people who develop lemmy and/or the people keeping your home instance up will accelerate the incredible growth of lemmy!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] leraje 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seriously why do you care ?

Not the person you were replying to but it does get a bit much when a thread isn't about Sync - like this one for example, which is trying to draw attention to funding Lemmy development and instance sustainability - and then it gets hit with people talking about how much they love Sync and they're happy to pay for it.

[–] APassenger 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You realize this branch started with someone adding 0 content about supporting the server or lemmy?

[–] leraje 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if this is your first time using threaded conversation based software but that's really not how a thread works.

[–] APassenger 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is what I see in Jerboa.

Is that not the first response to OP on this branch?

[–] leraje 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please see my previous response.

[–] APassenger 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this a point about using the word, "branch."

Or you pointing out that conversation organically drifts? Or something else?

[–] leraje 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's point about the fact that comments on a post are all part of the topic of that post and using the word 'branch' to try and infer that this is somehow a whole new subject under discussion is daft. Why do you think so many communities have 'stay on topic' as one of their rules?

[–] APassenger 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was going a different route. You've only policed the topic in a specific direction (that I've seen).

You're not obligated (and it would look Quixotic) to police every comment. But you sure took on a handful.

I haven't seen that the mods care. I've seen that you do as do some others, but what I see is discussion branching from different elements of the original submission. Like what happens on threaded discussion boards.

Lemmy is for discussion, those will sometimes wind around in a stream of (group) consciousness way. I understand some optics issues with bringing up the app, but it was in the original submission. People on both "sides" took the mention of the app and commented completely divorced from the state aim of the post. While those that mentioned the app and were on topic - those you policed.

If the mods care to force narrow conversation, that's up to them.

[–] leraje 1 points 1 year ago

'policed' - lol :)

I genuinely don't give a shit about what app anybody uses. I'm not anti or pro any particular app. Feel free to go through my comment history and you'll see mention of Sync in this and only this thread. Why?

Because a) I don't give a shit what app people use and b) this isn't a thread about Sync. The fact that the word 'Sync' appears in the title and body is used in an illustrative way to highlight the fact that Lemmy as a piece of software was developed by two guys who were given a grant. It needs funding via donations. Instance owners also need funding via donations. If these two things don't happen Lemmy goes away. That's the point of this thread, irregardless of what language or words were used. I'm not OP so I can't say why they chose to use Sync as an example.

When Sync users jump in to tell everyone how much they love Sync, that detracts from the point of the thread. It dillutes it and all of a sudden everyone's talking about Sync, not what the thread subject is about. OP and a couple others tried to go through this thread telling Sync posters that that wasn't the point of thread. Then Sync posters got annoyed and we started getting the 'I just want to use Sync', 'why do you care?' comments. So we responded to those too.

Mods are only going to step in if a thread gets nasty, which it hasn't. It's just very very frustrating to see a thread hijacked by people who want to talk about how great an app is in a thread designed to draw attention to the fact that Lemmy as a piece of software and instance owners - both of which any app absolutely requires in order to function - need support.

If you or anyone else wants to talk about Sync in a positive or negative way then I'm sure there are communities you can do that in. There's absolutely no need to enshittify a thread that has absolutely no bearing on Sync (or any other app) as a piece of software, especially when that thread discusses a subject as absolutely vital to the continued existence, growth and maturation of Lemmy as this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again this is organic. A large influx of sync users started being active on Lemmy. It will fade out in a matter of days.

I understand the sentiment but honestly feel like people are creating unnecessary drama. This is just a temporary trend just like we had days and days of beans meme which was also mildly annoying after 5/6 days.

[–] leraje 5 points 1 year ago

True, drama hits everywhere, but it can easily be avoided in a post about the importance of supporting lemmy development and instance sustainability by not going on that post to comment how much you personally love a for-profit app. Or any app in fact.

[–] Friendliestfire -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My guy go read the threads title

[–] leraje 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My guy read the actual post.

[–] APassenger 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are both the submission. Unfortunately OP made sync's cost part of the topic and the pivot point into a reasonable ask.

Headlines matter and cannot be completely separated from the entirety of the message.

[–] leraje 1 points 1 year ago

Y'know, most people are capable of nuance and ascertaining meaning from context.