Open Source

31931 readers

257 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Is there a creative commons or other open access art license that prevents it from being used to train AI? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I really don't want my photos, writings, etc to be used for things like StableDiffusion or ChatGPT, but some of them I still want to release under an open access license that's free for others to use in conventional derivative works, just specifically not AI. Does such a license exist?

Or at the very least, if my work is to be used to train AI, then I think the final models and neural networks themselves need to be open source and also free for anyone to use (as in, people should be able to download and run the AI on their own computer, not have to use the company's web app. Does CC-BY-SA protect against this since it requires that any derivative works also be released under the same license? Does it work like GPL in that regard?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think one of the problems right now is the lack of a proper legal definition of what is AI doing with your material. A human learning how to create original work by reading your work would not be required to cite it. The question is why and how exactly is AI doing something different.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

But if a human straight up copies someone else's writing, that's illegal. AI spits out word for word passages from training data all the time.