this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
170 points (95.2% liked)
Interesting
555 readers
1 users here now
- Be respectful to other members Treat others with kindness and courtesy, even if you disagree with their opinions.
- Stay on topic Keep your discussions relevant to the purpose of the forum. Avoid going off-topic or derailing conversations.
- No spamming Avoid posting irrelevant or unnecessary content, advertisements, or links to unrelated websites.
- Use proper language and tone Choose your words carefully when commenting or replying to others. Avoid using profanity or engaging in offensive language and personal attacks.
- Do not share personal information Protect your privacy by refraining from sharing personal details such as addresses, phone numbers, or email addresses on the forum.
- Report any issues If you come across any inappropriate behavior or content, report it to the forum moderators or administrators.
- Have fun and contribute positively Participate actively and add value to the discussions. Engage in meaningful and constructive conversations with fellow members.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The outstretched foot is what I'm looking at, the angle is highly unnatural. I suspect it was done to be intentionally obscure, but the outstretched foot, to me, from this horrible gif rendering, appears larger and smaller based on the clockwise rotation (indicating closer/further from the pov).
But the images depth appears to be compressed, you get this effect in photography by standing very far back and using a high zoom lens. The difference between near/far is smaller by comparison to the distance to the focal point, giving the illusion that things are more 2D. There's still hints you can look at, but the effect makes the differences between near and far, much smaller and harder to pick out.