this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
109 points (99.1% liked)

/kbin meta

639 readers
1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago
 

See Beehaw's Post to find out why

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't speak for other instances, but Beehaw requires a convincing explanation of why you feel that you are right for Beehaw and Beehaw is right for you.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"convincing" is a stretch. I wrote like 2 fluff lines about nothing and they approved the account.
It's kind of silly to think that a bunch of trolls couldn't do the same and join the site very easily. They're essentially trusting their users to pinky promise to tel the truth on the application lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even this requirement is enough to deter what I imagine is the vast amount of trolls. If people act up after being approved, they get banned.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Huh, interesting. Kbin.social just required an email confirmation.

So they're manually approving each user at beehaw then? That explains why their communities seemed small. They're managing ongoing mod work by having a much higher initial workload. Neat!