this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
59 points (98.4% liked)
D&D Next - 5e Discussion
412 readers
1 users here now
A place to discuss the latest version of Dungeons & Dragons, the fifth edition, known during the playtest as D&D Next.
Join our discord! https://discord.gg/dndnext
-- Rules --
- Be Civil. Unacceptable behavior includes name calling, taunting, baiting, flaming, etc. Please respect the opinions of people who play differently than you do.
- Use Clear, Concise Titles.
- Limit Self-Promotional Links. External links to blogs, kickstarters, storefronts, YouTube channels, etc, must be related to DnD and posted no more than once every 14 days. Affiliate links are never allowed.
This is a new community and the rules are in flux. Please bear with us (and give your feedback!) as we navigate building this new community. Thank you!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have mixed feelings on this. I backed the Kickstarter the day it launched, but I've since moved completely to PF2e. Hopefully there is still lots of inspiring content that I can convert into Pathfinder equivalent content.
I'm in the exact same boat. I'd like to use some of the monster lore and trying to convert the action oriented bosses to be used in PF2e. I'm thinking it would be pretty easy to just treat the Villain Actions as costing two actions in Pathfinder. I think the minion rules would transfer over as well.
I expect the easier approach is going to be using the PF2e custom monster rules to create something which matches the theme of the monsters in the book due to how different Pathfinder math and tactics are. But hopefully it at least gets the creative juices flowing. I really like MC's style in general so I'm certainly not upset, just a bit disappointed.