/kbin meta

639 readers

1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago

175

Now that federation works, we need more clarity of source (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm seeing the federated content, but it's hard to tell where the content came from. Currently, the only reliable way to see the source is by reading the URL when you're viewing a thread. It doesn't work well on mobile though and it doesn't work for the feed.

How work everyone feel if the magazine included the source always? So instead of saying kbinMeta, you'd see [email protected]? Or would you prefer another solution?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also, once in a thread, the magazine is not obvious. On the actual feed it says "by x in y" but in the thread it's not there.

I personally think in both places it should say: "by user in magazine on (not sure what the word here is but kbin, lemmy, beehaw, mastadon etc.)

Edit:at least on mobile that's what I'm seeing, although I just realized it does show it at the bottom but I still think having just the little not I mentioned at the top would be nice.