UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1233 readers

2 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

[email protected]

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone

HM05_Me

Sancorp has been awarded 1.9 million dollars by the Department of Defense for AARO services - Are these services aimed at preventing leaks and stopping whistleblowers? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SignullGone to c/uap

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Taken from the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena YouTube channel.

Found their Tweet relating to this as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Preventing leaks and stopping whistleblowers sure sounds a lot like Data Loss Prevention, which anyone and everyone should value.

They're an IT consultant. It's not far fetched to think a governmental agency handling classified material would seek to implement measures to prevent the dissemination of such material. They're highly likely to have instances of UAP that happen to be actual flights from classified developmental aircraft, and it stands to reason that such instances rightly deserve to be kept secret and the leaking of such information poses a security risk. And honestly, we really need to get better at using the terms around whistleblowing.

Is AARO doing something illegal, immoral, illicit, unsafe or fraudulent? If not it's just old fashioned leaking. Just because you think you have a right to such information doesn't mean that it's illegal for it to be kept from you.

[–] SignullGone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Preventing leaks and stopping whistleblowers sure sounds a lot like Data Loss Prevention, which anyone and everyone should value.

That's a fair point and makes a lot of sense in this context. Thank you.

Just because you think you have a right to such information doesn't mean that it's illegal for it to be kept from you.

I'm in agreement with you here. I do believe the new UAP Amendment is aimed at tackling this.